During the early 1950's I became interested in the small Michigan Empidonax flycatchers, all of which are much alike in color but much different in breeding habits. Consequently, I began studying the four species found in Michigan. One of these is the Acadian Fly- catcher (Empidonax virescens). Although I have mist-netted two Acadian Flycatchers outside of dense woodlots, along trcc and shrub-grown fence rows, near dense woodlots where they occurred, most all have bccn found throughout the entire summer inside the dense unpasturcd woods. However, these woodland habitats have varied considerably. All study areas have been in southwestern and south-central Michigan. The Michigan breeding range extends northward to Occana (my own observations), Montcalm, (specimen U.M.M.Z.), Saginaw (Wood, 1951) and Tuscola counties. THE AREAS STUDIED The most northern woods where I have found the Acadian Fly- catcher in Michigan was along the White River in Occana County. This was a bottomland habitat, grown chiefly to maple (Acer), in some places henflock (Tsuga canadensis), and in others elm (Ulmus sp.). The only nest that I found in the region was built in an oak on a level sand plain covered chiefly with white oak (Quercus alba), and cherries (Prunus sp.) above the bottomland woods. All Muskegon County woodlands studied were quite similar. They consisted of unpasturcd forests of beech-hemlock-maple, with some yellow birch (Betula lutea), white oak, red oak (Quercus rubra) and black oak (Quercus velutina). These forests were lumbered during the late 1800's but little since. The main study area in Laketon Township, Sections 5 and 6, still has elm (Ulmus americana) (some now dying from Dutch elm disease.), beech (Fagus grandifolia), yellow birch, oaks, maples, etc. up to 1 m d.b.h. with hemlocks up to 2/3 m d.b.h. The bottomland woods along the Battle Creek River, Convis Township, Calhoun County, was much like that along the White River, Oceana County, lacking henflocks. Maples (Acer sacchar- inurn) (A. rubrum), ash (Fraxinus americana and F. nigra) and bass- wood (Tilia americana) were the predominant trees. The study woods in Section 21, Convis Township, Calhoun FtGuaE 1. 1965 -- Distribution of the Acadian Flycatcher in Michigan. ¸ -- Summer sight record. ß -- Nest record. Triangle -- specimens. County was higher with little dampness except two small bordering leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata) bogs. In this woods there was little beech but more maple (Acer saccharum and A. rubrust), oaks (Q. alba, rubra and velutina) and scattered aspens (Populus tremu- loides), many cherries (Prunus serotina), and sassafras (Sassafras varifolium). The understory was small trees of the above species with one clump of witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiaaa). The tree canopy, as in other Acadian woodlots, was ahnost completely and solidly closed throughout. The study area in Section 1, Emmett Township, Calhoun County was a dry woodland, much drier than the other study areas, with no standing water or marsh, no chance of being flooded at all. Here grew beech, maple, oaks, cherry, hickory, some elm, a few haw- thorns (Crataegus sp.) and an understory of small trees including a number of flowering dogwood (Comus florida). Beneath these were found other shrubs and vines including poison ivy (Rhus toxicoden- dror,), Virginia creeper (Psedera vitacea), blackberry, black rasp- berry (Rubus sp.) and even many smaller annual plants such as sweet cicely (Osmorhiza sp.). ARRIVAL Acadian Flycatchers have been studied during time of arrival for many years. The first bird has always been a singing male. Follow- ing are records of these early dates: Calhoun County (Convis Twp.,-C) (Emroerr Twp.,-E) (Newton Twp.,-N): 26 May 1929 (C), 13 }\fay 1932 (N), 18 May 1933 (N), 16 May 1937 (C), 17 May 1938 (C), 14 May 1942 (C), 14 May 1944 (C), 21 May 1946 (C), 26 May 1948 (C), 20 May 1954 (E), 12 May 1955 (E), 13 May 1956 (E), 15 May 1957 (E), 18 May 1959 (E), 20 May 1960 (E), 23 May 1961 (C), 15 5lay 1962 (C), 6 May 1964 (C). Muskegon County early dates were (Laketon Twp.): 24 May 1953, 22 May 1955, 26 May 1956, 25 May 1957, 17 May 1958, 24 May 1959, 23 May 1964 (building nest). SONG AND CALLS Mumford (1964) gave descriptions of the calls and songs of this species. Much confusion on calls in the literature amongst writers seems to be the difference in their interpretation of the calls or songs. What a certain call sounds like to me may sound different to some- one else. Mumford described the advertising song as Tee-chup and it has been described differently by other authors. The call of the female I have described as Qweep. Mmnford described this call as peet, wseet, speet, or pseet. Mmnford also presented audiospccto- graphs of both the male advertising song and the female peet call. Mumford also published the rate of singing, showing that it was much faster at daylight, when a combination of songs was uttered, averaging about 67.8 notes per minute. In the dusk of evening, the male gave a different call or songs much higher in the trees but at a slower rate, 5.8 to 44 (average 32) per minute. My own observations indicate the normal advertising song during mid-day is given three to five times per minute. Mumford gave the average as 3.7 to 3.8 times per minute. The twittering call of the male, described by Mumford and others as the flutter call, is one similar to that given by Empidonax mini- mus and Empidonax fiavivertris. I have seen males of all three species give this call especially when they were trying to chase their mate away from some enemy or me, apparently fearing that she nfight give away the location of the nest. 230] Lawrence H. Walkinshaw Bird-Banding October o o Vol. XXXV[[ Studies of the Acadian Flycatcher [23 l 1966 Woods TERRITORIES OF ACADIAN FLYCATCHERS Scale 16 inches - 1 mile Field A Old k\ 77e I nest Bog Woods /A 103-98717 66-338Z 101 Field 1964 Field 1965 -'-66-77 559 -71 Woods FIGURE 2. Even one-day-old young in the nest gave a low twittering. When they left the nest, they gave a double-syllabled Chip-cttp for a food call. When well fed they seldom gave this call. BANDING During 1957 I caught by hand an adult fenhale Acadian Fly- catcher at her nest. Banded and released, she returned immediately to peck at my hand when I touched her nest. During 1958 I began using mist nets and since then have banded and captured banded birds with nets regularly in all three study woods. The results of these bandings are given in Tables I to 3. A total of 103 nestlings (Muskegon County, 57; Calhoun County, Emmett Township, 27; Convis Township, 19) have been banded since 1953. No young have ever been found any year after banding. All adults, both male and female, have returned to their same or adjacent territories. Only one pair has not mated for life. That pair mated for at least two years then separated, each joining a different mate during the next two years. Sometimes territories have changed somewhat because neighboring banded males did not re- turn. In this case those that did return usually expanded their ter- ritories. Sometimes a new male settled into these unoccupied terri- tories. During drought conditions, which affected the Calhoun County, Emmett Township woods considerably, no new males moved into the woods. Here the only surviving old male has had a much enlarged territory. A summary of the territory sizes is given in Table 5. TERRITORY Male Acadian Flycatchers apparently maintain their summer territories during their lifetime. Eight males (66.67 per cent) of 12 returned to their same identical territories the year after banding, TABLE 4. ACADIAN FLYCATCHER RETURNS ALL BANDED AS ADULTS Sex Year banded (At least one 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year year old) Calhoun County, Convis Township Male 3 2 1 Female 4 I i 1 Calhoun County, Emraett Township Male 3 3 2 1 Female 7 2 2 1 Muskegon County, Laketon Township Male 6 3 2 1 Female 8 3 2 2 Total Male 12 8 5 2 Female 19 6 5 4 Total all 31 (-6) 14 10 6 1 load ? 24-8728 NICHIGAN, CALHOUN COUNTY, E9ETT TOWNSHIP Road ---___ 959 o.. ...... ]- ......  I 7  I I/ :" // // ' / .C -T NEST$ AO TERRITORIES OF ACADIAR FLYCATCRERS t NlCHIGAN, CALHOUN COUNTY,EI91/2ETT TOWNSHIP Road Road l \ \ Road Road [ ß 13%  63-27726 I I f no'o ß 234 banded FIGURE 3. NESTS AND TEBRITORIE$ OF ACADIAN FL]CATHCER$ % / ß // Section 6 1961 ! ! / 9 3Z-3)166 MICHIGAN, MUSKI$OM GOUNTY,LAKETON T0WNSIIP /   6-8h28 , /  * 7 /  // k/ 19  )2-3310 / 1o2 [ l 0 /-  ./ 7 ', ' I I I  70-fi778 I 0  x ß 129 , I Michigan, Muskegon Count Laketo Towzhp FIGURE 4. on my three study woodlands. Five (41.67 per cent) returned the next year but one shifted to a territory adjacent to the one which he occupied formerly. The next year, two (16.67 per cent) returned to their same territories. The fifth year, one (8.33 per cent) main- rained even a larger territory than it had formerly but kept all of its original land. Of nineteen banded females, six (31.58 per cent) canhe back the next year to the sanhe territory, all mating with their original mates. The next year five (26.3 per cent) returned to their original terri- tories, the one mentioned above changing to a new mate. Four (21.05 per cent) returned the next year, all to their original mates insofar as I was able to ascertain. The results of banding are given in Table 4. All territories required tall trees in a solid forest where there was a closed canopy over smaller trees and shrubs. Sonhe took in a trail or highway running through the woodland but none included either fields or shrub-grown areas. Size of territories are given in Table 5, showing them to be a little larger than those listed by Iumford (1964). However, some of these territories were during drought seasons, 1961-1964, when they became larger. Sonhe of this was caused by loss of old males without new ones taking over in especially dry woods. In damper woods there seemed to be an increase in pairs during the sanhe period. TABLE 5. TERRITORY SIZES OF ACADIAN lq'LYCATCHERS Size of Muskegon County, Calhoun County, Calhoun County, Territory Laketon Township, Emmett Township, Convis Township, (Acres) Section 5 and 6 Section 1 Section 21 Total 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 29 30 31 32 33 36 37 38 39 4.0 4.1 4.2 Total Average 37 3.07 31 2.92 12 2.76 80 2.97 NESTING Actual nesting dates and locations in Michigan which I have observed were as follows: Oceana County, Section 33 (T13N, R17W): 19 July 1958. Muskegon County, Fruitland Township, Section 12 (TllN, R17W): 13 June 1953, 24 June 1954, 10 July 1955, 23 July 1955, Laketon Township, Sections 5 and 6 (T10N,R17W): 11 July 1954, 1 August 1954, 9 July 1955, 24 July 1955 (2), 30 July 1955, 9 June 1956 (2), 21 July 1956 (3), 6 July 1957, 14 July 1957, 20 July 1957, 31 May 1958 (2), 22 June 1958, 7 July 1959, 26 July 1959, ll June 1960, 3 July 1960, 31 July 1960, 17 June 1961 (2), 30 June 1961 (2), 23 July 1961, 9 June 1962 (3), 7 July 1962, 13 July 1962 (2), 27 July 1962 (2), 10 August 1962, 6 July 1963, 13 July 1963 (2), 28 July 1963, 24 May 1964, 31 May 1964 (4), 16 June 1964 (W. A. Dyer), 5 July 1964, 7 July 1964, 11 July 1964. Laketon Township, Section 21:12 June 1954, 28 July 1957, 5 July 1959, 24 July 1959, 12 June 1960. Allegan County, Ganges Township, Section 5 (T2,R16W): 4 August 1957. Barry County, Assyria Township, Section 19 (TIN, l7W): 25 July 1955, 12 June 1958 (2). Kalamazoo County, Ross Twp., Sherman Lake (T1S, R9W), Section 29:7 July 1931, 5 August 1949. Calhoun County, Emmett Twp., Section 1 (T2S, R7W): 12 June 1949, 5 June 1954 (2), 21 July 1954 (2), 4 August 1954, 2 June 1955, 12 July 1955, 25 July 1956, 4 June 1957, 9 July 1957 (2), 11 July 1957, 24 July 1957, 4 June 1958, 5 June 1958, 7 July 1958 (2), 11 July 1958, 18 July 1958, 31 July 1955, 29 June 1959 (2), 9 June 1960 (2) 16 June 1960, 26 July 1960, 2 August 1960, 18 June 1961 (3), 19 June 1961, 26 June 1961, 29 June 1961, 20 July 1961 (2), 13 June 1962 (2), 12 July 1962 (2), 20 July 1962 (3), 6 August 1964 (2). Emmett Twp., Section 25:9 June 1957. Convis Twp., Section 7:8 July 1938, 30 May 1945. Convis Twp., Section 14 (T1S, R6W): 30 July 1954, 2 August 1956. Convis Twp., Section 21:11 August 1960, 2 June 1961, 6 June 1961, 18 June 1961, 15 August 1961, 6 June 1962, 30 June 1962, 18 July 1962, 2 July 1963, 16 July 1963, 18 July 1963 (2), 23 July 1963, 24 July 1963, 26 May 1964 (3), 14 July 1964, 17 July 1964, 6 August 1964. Newton Twp., Section 12 (T3S,R7W): Observed June, July 1932, 1933. Jackson County, Spring Arbor Twp., Section 1 (T3S,R2W): 17 June 1960 (W. Poxyell Cottrille). Branch County, Union City: 7 July 1957, 9 June 1958 (W. A. Dyer). TABLE 6. NESTING TREES USED BY ACADIAN FLYCATCHERS Kind of tree Calhoun Co., Calhoun Co., Calhoun Co., Muskegon Co., Convis Twp., Convis Twp., Emmett Twp., Laketon Twp., Sects. 7, 14. Section 21. Section 1. Sects. 5, 6. Sect. 21. Tsuga canadensis NP NP NP 30 (61.i1%) 3 Betula lutea NP NP NP 1 Fagus grandifolia i LP 41 (93.18%) 14 (31.49%) 3 Quercus alba 1 Quercus velutina 2 Hamamelis virginiana NP 4 (18.18%) NP 1 Prunus serotina 1 Acer saccharum 3 15 (68.18%) 2 2 Acer sp. Totals 4 22 44 47 7 NP--None present in woods; LP--Very little present. (In Oceana County, one nest was in Quercus alba; in Allegan County, one in Tsuga canadensis; in Barry County, two nests in Carpinus caroliniana, one in Tilia americana; in Jackson County, one in Crataegus sp.; in Branch County, two in Acer sp.; in Kalamazoo County one in Acer saccharum and one in Fagus grandifolia. In Fruitland Township, Muskegon County, three nests were located in beech; one in yellow birch.) TABLE 7. NESTING OF THE ACADIAN FLYCATCHER. TREES FOUND IN 21, 10 METER QUADRATS WITH NEST USED AS CENTER MICHIGAN, CALHOUN COUNTY, CONV1S TOWNSHIP, SECTION 21 Tree and number Number of Total Average Average Extremes of times used as quadrats number number tree in a nest site in which of trees of trees size size in parentheses tree was found in in quadrat found and all 21 extremes quadrats of numbers found Acer saccharum (15) 20 (0-14) 94 4.47 3.2" -24" Carya glabra (0) 2 (0-1) 2 .09 1.25" 1-1" Fagus grandifolia (0) 0 (near) Hamamelis virginiana (3) 3 (0-8) 24 i. 14 i. 5" 1-2" Ostrya virginiana (0) 2 (0-1) 2 .09 3" 3" Populus tremuloides (0) 7 (0-6) 22 1.05 8.7" 4-11" Prunus serotina (i) i9 (0-i2) 79 3.79 6.3" /-10" Quercus alba (0) 16 (0-5) 42 2.00 5.4" 1-22" Quercus velutina (2) 19 (0-6) 57 2.70 7.8" i-16" Quercus rubra (0) 1 (0-1) i .05 1i.0" i1" Sassafras varifolium 5 (0-4) 13 .62 2.9" 1-9" Average & Total 21 (7-29) 336 16 5.2" -24" All measurements in inches. TXm. E 8. NESTINC OF THE ACXDXN F.YCXTCHER SHRUBS AND TREES FOUND N 40, 10 METER QUADRATS WITH NEST USED As CENTER MICHmXN, CX.HOUN COUNTY, EMETT TOWNSHIt, SECTION 1 Trees in 10 m Number of Total Average Average Extreme quadrats and quadrats number number tree in number of times in which of trees of trees size size used as nest site tree was found in in quadrat in parentheses found and all 40 extremes quadrats in numbers found Acer saccharura (2) 13 (0-46) 261 Carya glabra (0) 22 (0-35) 86 Cornus florida (0) 17 (0-25) 113 Crataegus sp. (0) 1 (0-4) 4 Fagus grandifolia (37) 39 (0-11) 165 Prunus serotina (0) 36 (0-8) 134 Quercus alba (1) 34 (0-17) 164 Quercus rubra (0) 25 (0-6) 62 Quercus velutina (0) 34 (0-8) 162 Sassafras varifoliurn 27 (0-25) 149 Ulrnus americana (0) 7 (0-3) 14 Zanthoxylura americanurn 6 52 2 15 2 83 10 4 12 3 35 4 10 1 55 4 O5 3.72 .35 .96" -3" 5.22" 1-16" ß 98" -2" 1.25" 1-2" 4.97" 1-16" 6.36" 1-18" 6.70" 1-20" 14.65" 1-22" 10.92" 3-22" 3.21" 1-12" 5.36" 2-22" 7 (0-71) 227 5.67 .48" 1_,, Average and Total 40 (17-95) 1541 38.52 4.46" 1-22" Measurements taken in inches 2 to 3 ft. above ground. Of 140 Acadian Flycatcher nests that I have observed in southern and western Michigan, 63 (45 per cent) were in beech (Fagus grandi- folia), 34 in hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) (24.28 per cent), 25 in maple (Acer saccharum and Acer sp.) (17.85 per cent), and 5 (3.57 per cent) were in witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), for 90.7 per cent of all observed nests. Two nests each were found in: yellow birch (Betula lutea), white oak (Quercus alba), black oak (Q. velutina) and blue beech (Carpinus carolinians); and one each in black cherry (Prunus serotina), hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), and basswood (Tilia americana). Trees used as nest sites are shown in Table 6. In each woodland there seemed to be one favorite. In all Muskegon County woods, hemlock, beech and maple were found in considerable amounts, yet here hemlock was used the most commonly (61.11 per cent), beech second (31.49 per cent) and maple third (3.7 per cent). Nineteen of first nests were built in hemlock and 12 second nests, showing that the size of leaves on deciduous trees had little effect on the nest site. In the Barry County woods, two of three nests were in blue beech. In the Emmett Township, Calhoun County woodland, 41 (93.18 per cent) of 44 nests were in beech trees. In the Convis Township, Calhoun County woods, beech was scarce. Here the birds used chiefly maple (68.18 per cent) but one pair that had a large clump of witch hazel in their territory built four nests in these. Whereas there was witch hazel in all Muskegon County woods, it was used only once. TABLE 9. 'ESTING OF THE ACADIAN FLYCATCHER SHRUBS AND TREES FOUND IN 47, 10-METER QUADRATS WITH NEST USED As CENTER MICHIGAN, MUSKEGON COUNTY LAKETON TOWNSHIP, SECTIONS 5 6 Trees in 10 m Number of Total Average Average quadrats and .quadrats number number tree number of times m which of trees of trees size used as nest site tree was found in in quadrat in parentheses found and all 47 extremes quadrats in numbers found Extremes in size Acer saccharum (2) 46 (0-34) 330 7.02 6.32" 1-26" Benzoin aestivale (0) 12 (0-5) 39 .83 .47" -" Betula lutea (1) 30 (0-7) 98 2.09 7.70" /-13" Fagus grandifolia (14) 36 (0-21) 265 5.64 4.69" 1/i-22" Fraxinus americana (0) 21 (0-5) 43 .92 10.34" 2-12" Pinus strobus (0) 1 (0-1) 1 1.0  1" Prunus serotina (0) 17 (0-5) 32 .68 4.28" 1-12" Hamamelis virginiana (0) 5 (0-5) 13 .28 .69" i/i-l" Quercus alba (0) 19 (0-6) 54 1.15 8.69" Quercus rubra & (0) 12 (0-11) 40 .85 12.2" /-28" Q. velutina Sassafras varifolium 3 (0-8) 18 .38 3.72" 2-11" Ulmus americana (0) 1 (0-2) 2 2.5" 2-3" Tsuga canadensis (30) 35 (0-24) 336 7.15 4.72" /-18" 47 (15-42) 1271 27.04 5.75" -40 ' Measurements taken on trees in inches 2 to 3 feet above ground. Using each nest site as the center, the trees in 10 meter quadrats are listed in Tables 7, 8, and 9. In the Convis Township study area maples were found in 20 of the 21, wild cherry in 19 and black oak in 19, yet 15 nests were located in maple, i in black cherry and 2 in black oak. In the Emmett Township woodland, beech was found in 39 of 40 quadrats, wild cherry in 36, and both white and black oak in 34, yet 37 nests were located in beech and only one in the other three. Maple, here, was much scarcer, found in only 13 quaaltars. In the Muskegon County study area maple was found in 46 of 47 quaaltars but only two nests were placed there. Beech was found in 36, where 14 nests were located; in only 35 quadrats was helnlock present, yet 30 nests were built in hemlock. The height of nests is given in Table 10. The average height of 138 nests was 405.5 cm. (13 ft., 3.6 in.) with extremes of 107 cm up to 1,676 cm (3 ft. 6 in. up to 54 ft. 10 in.), both very extreme. Heights of beech nests averaged 397.3 cm; hemlock, 377.9 cm; and maple nests, 410 cm. The distance from the tree trunk averaged 326.6 (24.4-558)cm; the distance from the end of the usual long sweeping branch, 84.3 (31-129) cm. Most nests have been located in the nfiddle or lower forest story, but one in 1964 was about 55 feet above ground, well 10. HEIGHT OF ACADIAN FLYCATCHER NESTS IN MICHIGAN Tree in which nest was found Clhoun Clhoun Clhoun Muskegon Co., Co., Co., Co., Convis Convis Emmett Laketon Twp., Twp., Twp., Twp., Sects. 7, 14. Section 21. Section 1. Sects. 5, 6. Muskegon Co., Laketon Twpo, Section 21. Fruitland Twr. Section 12. Acer saccharum 5 Acer sp. Betula lutea Fagus grandifolia 1 Hamamelis virginiana Prunus serotina Quercus alba Quercus velutina Tsuga canadensis 459.5 14 525.1 367.2 4 281.6 I 671.0 2 903.0 2 488.0 3 532.0 1 378.0 41 355.3 15 547.9 1 731.0 28 380.1 670.0 308.0 214.2 3 358.0 Measurements in centimeters. Nine other nests averaged 329.3 centimeters. The average of 138 nests, 405.5 (107-1,676) centimeters. up in the upper story. This pair had lost two lower nests in the middle story, possibly to a Barred Owl pair which was nesting there. They then moved their nest above the usual Barred Owl activities. Sometimes nests have been found over trails, over shaded roads, or over shady streams. Mumford (1964) found the birds often nested over a clear spot so they could more easily reach the nest by flying from beneath up to it. This habit also probably accounts for the use of beech and hemlock most often because few shrubs or small trees grow beneath them. THE NEST Many Acadian Flycatcher nests appear very weak; others are beautiful structures. Some are still hanging almost intact the year following use. In most cases, they are so thin that the eggs can be counted from underneath if a light spot of sky shows overhead. On two occasions I found nests where eggs had fallen through the bottom. In Fruitland Township, Muskegon County the birds used a type of grass (Panicurn sp.) which was very flimsy, yet they managed to raise at least one young in each of four nests. In the usual woods where hemlock was found the best constructed nests were found, however. Here they used cobwebs and hemlock twigs then lined the nest with fine grasses. One such nest in August 1959 consisted of 154 dead henflock twigs (3.1 grams), 52 pieces of coarse grass (.3 grams) and many fine cobwebs (.3 grams). The total weight was 4.5 grams, the total items, 233 plus cobwebs. Another Muskegon .-': .i - TM --' . 3/4-, ß .. . .! Fcua 5. Nest and eggs, 16 June 1954, Calhoun Co., Michigan. County nest in 1960 consisted of mostly hemlock twigs interwoven with cobwebs and many flowers of oak and maple trees. In Calhoun County, nests were built chiefly of vegetable fibers and a few cobwebs. One 1960 nest consisted of 189 pieces of sweet ciccly (l.4 grams), 22 black oak flowers (.3 grams), 13 pieces of grape bark and 11 pieces of other fine bark (.4 grams), cobwebs (.55 grams), 2 small dead leaves plus 22 pieces of unknown plants (.25 grams). The total weight, 2.9 grams; total pieces, 259 plus cobwebs. The average weight of 14 Muskegon County nests was 4.65 grams and 9 in Calhoun County, 3.4 grams, xvhcn dry and after use. The average weight of 23 nests was 4.15 grains. The outside dialneter of 30 nests averaged 80.5 nnn.; the depth, 44.1 min. The inside dia- meter of 35 nests was 48.2 (43-59) mm and the depth, 27.1 (18-36) min. Often long pieces of nest material hung from the bottom of the nest in haphazard fashion, making it appear like a mass of leaves or trash hanging from the branch. Nests built by banded individuals showed that they did not all build nests of equal architecture, nor each nest by the same bird. Often the first spring nest was much better built than later ones; again the second nest was built as well or better. THE EGGS Acadian Flycatcher eggs are white or creamy colored, wreathed with black or brown spots at the larger ends. The spots vary from one-half to about three mm in diameter and are often at the widest part of the egg. Spots number from 7 to 67 or more. When the spots are larger, there are usually fewer in number. Eggs, ovate in shape, are not very glossy. The average measurements of 106 eggs was 18.64 X 13.99 mm and the average weight, 1.85 g. The largest egg measured 21.2 X 14.9 ram, and the smallest 17.3 X 13 min. Following were the measurements of 11 marked sets, given in the order of which the eggs were laid: Nest 36: First egg laid, 10 July 1957. Eggs measured: 18.2 X 14.6, 18.4 X 14.6, and 17.9 X 14.4 min. Nest 38: First egg, 13 July 1957:19.0 X 14.4, and 19.1 X 14.4 min. Nest 41: First egg, 25 July 1957: 18.7 X 14.6, and 19.0 X 14.5 min. Nest 47: First egg, 4 June 1958:18.8 X 14.8, and 19.1 X 14.2 min. Nest 48: First egg, 9 July 1958:19.0 X 14.6, and 20.0 X 14.4 nun. Nest 54: First egg, 10 July 1958: 19.8 X 14.9, 19.3 X 14.9, and 19.0 X 13.7 min. Nest 57: First egg, 19 July 1958: 18.7X 14.0, and 19.2X 14.5 min. Nest 58: First egg, 20 July 1958:18.0 X 14.0, and 18.0 X 14.0 min. Nest 59: First egg, 31 July 1958:17.8 X 14.0, and 17.8 X 14.0 min. Nest 80: First egg, 22 June 1961: 19.5 X 14.0, 19.0 X 14.0, and 20.0 X 13.8 min. Nest 113: First egg, 13 July 1963:19.0 X 13.7, 19.5 X 13.7, and 19.6 X 14.2 min. First-laid eggs averaged 18.77 X 14.35; second-laid eggs, 18.94 X 14.31 ram; and third-laid eggs, 18.72 X 14.4 min. The average of 95 unparasitized lichigan Acadian Flycatcher egg sets was 2.937 eggs. Following were the size of sets on the three study areas: Muskegon County, Calhoun County, Calhoun County, Laketon Township, Convis Township, Emmett Township, Sections 5 and 6. Section 21. Section 1. First sets 3. 045 (iX4, 21X3) 3.00 (4X3) 2. 923 (lX4, i0X3, 2X2) Second sets 2.929 (26X3, 2X2) 2. 875 (7X3, 1X2) 2.80 (i2X3, 3X2) Average 2.980 2. 916 2. 857 Indications are that first sets are larger than second sets and that egg sets farthest north are the largest. Females lay one egg daily until the set is complete. First and second eggs are usually laid prior to 0800, third eggs between 0900 and 1200 noon. F(;utE 6. 7 August 1954, Emmett Twp., Calhoun Co., Mich. HISTORIES OF INDIVIDUAL BIRDS Some histories of the different nestings of individually banded Acadian Flycatchers are given here: (Calhoun County, Emmet Township.). Female, 24-82728: Nest 33. 4, 5, 6 June 1957, 3 eggs laid (no. I disappeared.). 18, 19 June, 2 eggs hatched (G. Thomas, R. Tompkins). 2 July, 2 young left nest (G. Thomas). Nest 38. 11 July 1957, Nest completed 3 m directly above nest 33, in same tree. 13, 14, 15 July, 3 eggs laid (two eggs measured 19.0 X 14.4, 19.1 X 14.4, min.). 18 July, eggs taken by predator. Nest 41. 24 July 1957. New completed nest f(mnd 56 m E of nests 33 and 38. 25, 26 July, 2 eggs laid (measured, 18.7 X 14.6, 19 X 14.5 mm.). 9,10 August, 2 eggs hatched. 22 August, 2 young left nest. Nest 47. 4 June 1958, nest found 61.2 m from first 1957 nest, 1 egg. 5 June, 2nd egg laid (eggs measured 18.8 X 14.8, and 19.1 X 14.2 mm.). 19 Jtme, 5 a.m., I young; 7 p.m., 2 young. 7 July, young left nest. Female snapped bill at me when I stood under old nest. Nest 55. 11 July 1958, new nest found, 28 m. SI'] of nest 48. 12, 13, 14 July, 3 eggs laid (measured 18.0 X 14.3, 18.5 X 14.3, and 18.0 X 13.7 mm.). 28 July, last egg hatched. 14 August, 3 y(nmg left liest. Nest 61. 29 June 1959, nest found 5 m from nest 55 site. 1 egg (measured, 20.5 X 14 min.). 7 July, only the one egg and one Cowbird egg. Deserted. I never saw this bird again. In 1957, she laid 8 eggs, fledged 4 young; during 1958, 5 eggs, and fledged 5 young. In the same Emmett Township woods a pair nested during 1957, 1958 and 1959. I was nnable to capture them but did so in 1960. The male returned through 1964, the female through 1963. Following is their history. During 1957, birds not banded, a Cowbird was fledged on 9 July. In the next tree, I found a nest with two eggs (measured 17.3 X 13.0 mid 18.0 X 13.7 min.), and one Cowbird egg, 7 July 1958, from which later a Cowbird fledged. Although there were birds here during 1959 I did not find their nests. I)uring 1960 the following occurred: Male, 63-27726; female, 63-27798. Nest 68. 9 June 1960, nest fonnd with two Acadian Flycatcher eggs (measured 17.3 X 14.0, 18.7 X 14.7 min.), and I Cowbird egg. 16 June, Cowbird egg hatehe& Cowbird fledged 11 days later. Nest 76. 2 August 1960, nest found with I infertile egg (measured 18 X 14 min.), and 2 small young, 75 m west of nest 68. Young left nest about 12 August. Nest 82. 18 June 1961, female building nest 110 m E of nest 68. 19, 20 June continued building then deserted it. Nest 86. 26 June 1961, completed nest fonnd 65 m NNW of nest 82. 29 June, still empty. 6 July, 1 broken Acadian egg underneath nest on ground; 1 Cowbird (bill-punctured)egg in nest, deserted. Nest. 90. 20 July 1961, Nest found in same tree as nest 68, I egg (measured 18.7 X 14.4 min.), 1 Cowbird egg. One Acadian egg found broken beneath nest on ground. 8 August, both Acadian Flycatcher and Cow- bird egg discovered infertile. Nest soon deserted. Nest 98. 13 June 1962, Nest found with 2 eggs (measured 17.0 X 14.0, 17.5 X 13.7 ram.), and 1 newly hatched young. This was the only egg that hatched. 24 June, nest all torn to pieces. Nest 100. 3{) June 1962, new nest found with 2 eggs (16.8 X 13.5, and 16.8 X 13.4 mm.), and I Cowbird egg. 9 July, all toru to pieces and appar- ently female used this nest in building a new one. Nest 98 was in same tree as nest 68; nest 100, in the next tree 30 m from nest 98. Nest 107. 2t) July 1962, nest found in oak, 98 m SW of nest 100. Female in- cubating 3 eggs. 15 August 3 young out of nest. 1)uring 1963 this pair had 2 yomg out of nest on 23 July but I could never find any new nest. During 1964, the male was there but I never found the female. I found two old nests on his territory in early August. A female was banded iu Calhoun County, Convis Township, in 1961. Her mate was banded in 1962 and they both returned during 1963 and 1964. Following is their history: Female, 66-33581 (Male after 1962, 103-98717). Nest 77. A nest was found here in 1960 from which 3 young fledged 12 August. Nest 78. 2 June 1961, completed empty nest found 10 m. from nest 77. 5 June, 1 egg (measured 18.2 X 14.0 ram.). Deserted. Nest 79. 6 June 1961, new completed nest found 6 m from nest 78. 12, 13, 14 June eggs laid. 27 June, 6 a.m., 2 youug, 1 egg. 28 June, 6 a.m. 3 young. 11 July, 3 young fledged. Nest 93. 15 August, 1961, nest found 36 m S of nest 79, 2 small young. Between 22 and 29 August, 2 young left. nest. Nest 101. 30 June 1962, nest found with 3 eggs (measured 18.0 X 14.1, 17.6 X 13.8, and 17.5 X 13.7 min.). 2 m from nest 78 site. 14 July 2 eggs hatched and left nest about 27 July. Seen with parents up until 7 August, parents did not renest. Nest 117. 28 June 1963, at least 2 young just out of maple nest near site of nest 93. Nest 118. 24 July 1963, nest found in maple along edge of leatherleaf bog. Con- tents aud mmber of young reared were not known. Nest 122. 21 May 1964, female building nest which was completed 26 May. This was 10 m from nest 118. 28, 29 May, 2 eggs laid (measured 17.8 X 13.8, 17.5 X 13.5 min.). (Later a Cowbird egg was laid in nest bu only 1 Acadian Flycatcher fledged about 26 June.--W. A. Dyer). Nest 132. 14 July 1964, empty completed nest found 42 m from nest 122. 16, 17, 18 July, 3 eggs laid. 6 August, 3 young in nest. 15 August (estimated) one young left nest, others had disappeared. In this same woods another pair was captured in 1963. Male, 66-77559, female, 66-77552. Nest 115. 28 June 1963. 3 young just out of nest near road. Nest 119. 16 July 1963. Nest found 22 m from nest 115, 2 eggs (measured 18.6 X 13.6, 19.2 X 13.5 mm.), and 1 Cowbird egg. 29 July, 7 p.m., 1 young; 30 July, 7 a.m. 2 young. Cowbird egg failed to hatch. Estimated young left nest 10-11 August. This male had a different mate, 71-82785, in 1964. Her 1964 history was: Nest 121. 26 May 1964, partially completed nest found 18 m. from nest 115. 29 May, i egg (18.0 X 13.2 ram.). (Three eggs laid; three young fledged). Nest 133. 17 July 1964. Nest found over road, 110 m NW of nest 121, 3 eggs. 29 July, 3 young in nest. 11 August, last young left nest when I looked at it with a mirror on a pole. In Laketon Township, Muskegon County, I found the following pairs throughout different summers: Male 61-81428 (1959, 1960); female 63-27805, 1960: Nest 60. 7 June 1959. Nest on small branch of small beech well beneath the forest canopy. A Cowbird egg was built into the nest bottom and the nest contained three eggs (18.2 X 13.5, 18.2 X 13.5 and 18.2 X 13.2 ram.). Both birds were scolding a Barred Owl. 3 July, two young left nest. Cowbird egg still h bottom. Nest 65. 26 July 1959. Nest found again in small beech 100 m SW of Nest 60. Three newly hatched young. Three young left nest between 2 and 8 August. Nest 66. 5 June 1960. Nest found in small beech, 12 m from nest site 65, 1 egg. 11 June 3 eggs (18.0 X 13.0, 17.6 X 13.2, 18.0 X 13.3 ram). Nest destroyed shortly after this. Nest 73. 3 July 1960. Nest found 50 m N of nest 66.2 eggs, 1 Cowbird egg. One young Acadian Flycatcher left this nest 17 July. This nest 6 m. up in beech. Nest 75. 31 July 1960. Female building new nest 4 m up in terminal parting of beech branch. 4 August, 2 eggs in nest. 20 August, 2 young in nest. 1 September, 2 young just out of nest. During 1959 the female of this pair laid 6 eggs and fledged 5 young. During 1960, femme 63-27805 laid at least 7 eggs and fledged 3 young. Female 32-33131 (During 1963, 1964 male, 32-33130): Nest 80. 17 June 1961. Empty nest found 4 rn up on horizontal hemlock branch. 23 June, 8 a.m. 2 eggs, 7 p.m., 3 eggs. 4 July, 6 p.m., 3 eggs. 7 July, 7 p.m., 3 young. 19 July, young gone. Nest 97. 9 June 1962. Nest 5 m up on horizontal hemlock branch, 65 m from site of nest 80. 1 egg in nest. 25 June, I egg, i young in nest, i egg foung underneath on ground. 26 June, 2 young. 2 young left this nest shortly after 7 July. Not seen later. Nest 113. 13 July 1963. Nest 3 m up on horizontal henflock branch, 1 egg. 14 July, 2nd egg laid, the third probably the next day. (19.0 X 13.7, 19.5 X 13.7, 19.6 X 14.2 ram., egg measurements.). 28 July, 5 p.m. still 3 eggs. 3 August, 2 young about 5 days old. They left the nest about 11, 12 August. (W. A. Dyer found this pair with a hemlock nest 30 June where three young were just out of the nest.) Nest 124. 31 May 1964. Female building nest 2 m up in hemlock. 3, 4 June 2 eggs laid. 5 June, eggshells on ground beneath nest. Nest 128. (16 June 1964. Nest found 4 m up on small spindly horizontal maple branch, 2 eggs, W. A. Dyer). 10 July, 3 young about 9 days old. 18 July, young out of nest. Thus during the four summers I found or saw five nests of this female. She raised during 1961, 1 young; during 1962, 2 young; during 1963, 5 young; during 1964, 2 young. She had at least two different mates but used the same territory during the four summers. During the last two summers she was missing part of her right foot. During these same summers she laid, 1961, at least 3 eggs, 1962, at least 3 eggs, 1963, 6 eggs; 1964, 5 eggs. Female 32-33132 (During 1961, 1962, male 32-33130; during 1963, 1964, male 104-36174). Nest 89. 30 June 1961. Nest found 4 m up on lowest hemlock branch, 3 young. 9 July, I captured both adults and was banding them beneath the nest when I heard the young calling. I looked up and a male Cowbird was pecking them very severely. They all flew out into the forest. I did not find a second nest. Nest 96. 9 June 1962. Nest found 1 m up on hemlock branch, 3 eggs (eggs measured, 18.8 X 14.6, 19.0 X 13.5, 19.0 X 13.5 ram.) 25 June, eggs gone. This female was captured. Nest 109. 27 July 1962. Nest found 4 m up on hemlock branch 4 m from three trunk, 3 eggs. 3 Aug, still 3 eggs. 10 August, 3 half-grown young. Female captured again. 26 August, 3 young found outside nest being fed by both parents. Nest 112. 6 July 1963. Nest found 3 m up on hemlock branch, 3 young nearly ready to fly. 9 July, male captured and banded; female captured again. 13 July, 3 young out of nest. Both birds were found with young for some time and apparently female did not renest. Nest. 125. 31 May 1964. Completed empty nest found 3 m up on hemlock branch. 2, 3 June 2 eggs; 4 June, 3 eggs. (17, 18 June eggs hatched and young left nest alright--W. A. Dyer). Nest 129. 5 July 1964. Nest found 4 m up on hemlock branch, 3 eggs. 18 July, 7 a.m. still 3 eggs. 23-24 July, 3 young. 31 July, 3 young left nest when I looked in it with mirror. This female, during four summers laid: 1961, at least 3 eggs; 1962, at least 6 eggs; 1963, 3 eggs; 1964, six eggs. She raised, 3, 3, 3, and probably 6 young each year, respectively. Female, 32-33166, male, 32-33167. Nest 88. 30 June 1961, Nest found 4 m up in small maple, 3 eggs (eggs measured 21.0 X 13.8, 20.4 X 13.8, and 20.0 X 14.1 min.). 7 July, 7 p.m., 3 eggs 9 July, 7 a.m., 3 young. 22 July, young left on own accord. Both parents caught., banded. Nest 102. 7 July 1962, nest found 4 m up in beech tree. Male and female identified. 3 eggs in nest. 13 July, only 2 eggs now in nest. 21 July, 2 young. 29 July, 2 young. 3 August, young out of nest. Nest 1i4. 13 July 1963, nest found with 3 young just out. Nest 5 m up on hemlock branch. Male identified, female ?? Female, 71-82781. Nest 127. 31 May 1964, female building nest 2 m up in small beech tree. 1 June, I egg; 2 June, 2 eggs (3 June, 10:05 a.m., 2 eggs, 4 June, 9.45 a.m., 3 eggs (2 eggs measured 17.6 X 13.5, 18.0 X 14.1 min.). 17 June I egg hatched (the only one that did hatch.). I young left nest i July. W. A. Dyer.) Nest 131. 11 July 1964, female had completed new nest 4 m up in beech tree branch. She used most of the material from nest 127 which was only 22 m away. 12 July, 1st egg laid. 18 July, 3 eggs in nest. 26 July, still 3 eggs but 31 July, 3 young about 4 days old. 8 August, nest empty and apparently young taken by predator. FIGURE 7. August 1959, Muskegon Co. THE NESTING SEAON From the records of banded individuals one notes that the average breeding season for the Acadian Flycatcher begins in late May during warmer years, early June during cooler years, then lasts until mid-August or September in _hiichigan. One must realize that these records are (especially in [uskegon County) at the northern edge of the range of this species. In Calhoun County the average first laid egg for five banded females was 1 June (28 ,iay to 5 June); in Muskegon County the average was 3 June (31 May to 9 June) for seven records. If young are fledged from the first nest by 20-25 July the birds will usually attempt a second brood even in [ichigan. Consequently, farther south the species should be double-brooded always. The latest record of young leaving a second nest came 29 August in Calhoun County, 31 August in Muskegon County. The average of last nest terminated for Calhoun County was 11 August and for Muskegon County, 8 August (See Table ll.). The average period between the laying of the first egg in sramher until the last nest was terminated in Calhoun County was 76 days; Muskegon County, 63 days. One [uskegon female in 1964 laid her first egg 2 June. She fledged 3 young from this nest by late June and she laid eggs in her new nest by 2, 3 and 4 July from which the 3 young left 31 July-1 August. The periods between the fiedging date in the first nest and the first laid egg in the next nests in four other cases were 11, 5, 8, and 15 days (average, 10 days). Two periods between the loss of eggs from predation and the laying of the first egg in the next nest, were 7 and l0 days. INCUBATION PERIODS Incubation periods have been obtained at the following nests: (33) 4-6 June 1957 (3 eggs laid), 3rd egg hatched 19 June -- 13 days. (36) 10-12 July 1957 (3 eggs laid), 2 eggs hatched 25 July -- 13 or 14 days. (41) 25-26 June 1957 (2 eggs laid), both eggs hatched 9 August -- 14 days. (47) 4-5 June 1958 (2 eggs laid), both hatched 19 June -- 14 days. (54) 11 July 1958 (3rd egg laid), 3rd egg hatched 26 July -- 15 days. (55) 14 July 1958 (3rd egg laid), 3rd egg hatched 28 July -- 14 days. (57) 19-20 July 1958 (2 eggs laid), both hatched 3 August -- 14 days. (79) 12-14 ,June 1961 (3 eggs laid), 3rd egg hatched 28 ,June -- 14 days. (80) 23 June 1961 (3rd egg laid), 3rd egg hatched 7 July -- 14 days. (84) 24 June 1961 (3rd egg laid), 3rd egg hatched 8 July -- 14 days. (97) 11 June 1962 (3rd egg laid), 3rd egg hatched 26 June -- 15 days. (125) 4 June 1964 (3rd egg laid), 3rd egg hatched 18 June -- 14 days. (127) 4 June 1964 (3rd egg laid), I egg hatched only, 17 June -- 13 or 14 days. Thus there were one period of definitely 13 days, 8 of 14 days and two of 15 days and two either 13 or 14 days. Female Acadian Flycatchers are sometimes quite tame and on at least two occasions I have had to push the birds off the nest to see what was in it. One bird came back and sat on an empty nest as I weighed and measured her eggs below her. I had to push her off the nest to replace the eggs. The female does all of the incubating and at times begins the day the first egg is laid. In Muskegon County, 21 July 1956, during 106 minutes, the female incubated 90 minutes (1 period) and was away during periods of 5 and 11 minutes. At the same nest 29 July, she incubated 169 minutes (8-35) and was away 33 (1-5) minutes. The average period on the nest for these two days (10 periods) was 25.9 (8-90) nfinutes; the average period away (12 periods) was 4.1 (1-11) minutes for 15.9 per cent of the time. She incubated for the remain- ing 84.1 per cent of the time. Her periods away from the nest were spent chiefly in search of food. Once I saw the male feed her after 250] Lawrence H. Walkinshaw Bird-Banding October Vol. xxxvII Studies of the Acadian Flycatcher [251 1966 252] Lawrence H. Walkinslaw Bird-Banding October ß .. ß ß .= .. ß F,6Ulr. 8. 23 July 1954, CMhoun Co. she left the nest but usually she obtained her own food, flycatching it 45 to 50 m from the nest. On two occasions I observed males feed the female at the nest. At another ,[uskcgon County nest 7 July 1964, female attentive periods were 42, 46, 33 and 42 minutes; periods away from the nest, 3, 3, and 3 minutes. At the same nest 10 July, attentive periods were 28, 45 and 38 minutes; inattentive periods, 3, and 3 minutes. Again 11 July attentive periods were 49, 48 and 31 minutes, with periods away 3, 8, 4, and 9 minutes. The average attentive period for this 1964 nest was 40.2 minutes (28-49) and the average period away 4.3 (3-9) minutes. The per- centage of attcntivcncss, 91.13 per cent; away, 8.87 per cent. THE YOUNG ,'fumford (1964) gave descriptions of newly hatched and young birds throughout their nestling life. The pink or flesh-colored skin together vith the short white down on newly hatched Acadian Fly- catchers are distinctive for this species. The down on the other Empidonax flycatchers in A [ichigan is gray or mouse-gray. At hatch- ing time 8 young averaged in xvcight 1.33 grams, from 1.2 grams up to 1.6. Wings averaged 6.3 mm in length, tarsi, 6 min., and exposed culmcns, 3 min. By 5 days they averaged in xvcight, 4.7 grams; had wings 10.8 mm long; tarsi, 8.6; and culmcns, 5.5 min. Primaries be- F(vir: 9. 18 July 1.q55, Muskegon Co. gan showing at two or three days. At 10 days of age xveights aver- aged 11.8 grams; wings measured 39.1 min.; tarsi, 14.5 ram; and ex- posed cuhnens, 7.8 min. By 23 days a hand-reared bird had a wing of 62 min., tarsus 15.5 and cuhnen of 9 min. The tail began to show at 5 days, reached 9.4 min. at 10 days, 20.5 mm at 15 days, and 37 llq_lll. at 23 days. When first hatched young show little life but respond immediately when adults return with food. While in a blind I heard a returning male call a low Pum'p when feeding newly hatched young. They raised their heads, opened their mouths aud uttered a low Zeeep. At four days they gave this same call when I removed them from the nest to weigh them. At four days they showed much yellow in the breast and had a mottled appearance on the back, much different from other Michigan Empido.nax flycatchers. During a period of 185 minutes, parents feeding 3 young, 8 days old, 12:15-2:15 p.m. and 3:25-4:30 p.m., 2 August 1959, the male fed 11 times, the female 17. The average period between feedings for the male was 10.7 (2-26) and for the female, 7.6 (1-28) lninutes. Young left nests when the following ages (each family group separated from the next): 14, 14; 14, 14, 13; 14, 14, 13; 15, 15, 15; 14; 14, 14, 13; and 14, 14, 13 days. If disturbed young left the nest when 12 days of age, showing great fear. When 12 or 13 days old they jumped out of the nest, crawled along on the ground and hid on top of the leaves, later working up a few cm to a perch. When 14 or 15 days old they flew directly out into the woods from 18 to 50 m, the average for 12 young being 30-31 m. On one occasion I kept a young Acadian for a week then returned him to his home territory. Before I released him, his mother was standing on a branch only about 5 m from 1he and she fed him very shortly afterwards. At another time I released a young Acadian which I had had for 14 days onto a territory where the young were just leaving the nest. He began begging for food but was attacked by both parents of the territory, the male most strenuously for over an hour. Soon the female fed him. The next morning, both birds were feeding him as well as their own three. He could fly very well and was 28 days old. Usually the male feeds young from the first nest while the female incubates eggs in the second. Parents normally fed young until they were 25 or more days of age after which they were almost impossible to find. They foraged through the middle and upper story of the trees on their parents' territories. ST AD QQ SUCCESS Of 121 Acadian Flycatcher nests that I observed, 88 had young hatch in them (72.72 per cent) and 78 (64.46 per cent) fledged young. Excluding 25 Cowbird parasitized nests, of 96 nests re- corded, 77 (80.21 per cent) had young hatch in them and 68 (70.83 per cent) fledged young. The Emmett Township woods had the poorest success. Here only 19 (63.33 per cent) of 30 unparasitized nests fledged young; 23 of all 44 nests (52.27 per cent). In Convis Township, 11 of 13 nests fledged young (84.61 per cent). In Muske- gon County, 42 of 58 (72.41 per cent) nests fledged young. Young were fledged in 10 (40.00 per cent) of 25 parasitized nests, and 11 (44 per cent) had young Acadian Flycatchers hatch in them. Of 319 Acadian Flycatcher eggs, 216 (67.7 per cent) hatched and 183 (57.37 per cent) fledged. In unparasitized nests, 193 (71.21 per cent) of 271 eggs hatched and 163 (60.11 per cent) fledged. Of 48 Acadian eggs in parasitized nests, 23 (47.91 per cent) hatched and 20 (41.67 per cent) fledged. (In Emmett Township, 80 eggs were laid in unparasitized nests of which 50 (60.25 per cent) hatched and 41 (51.25 per cent) fledged, while in parasitized nests, only 8 hatched and fledged (30.76 per cent). In Convis Township, 32 of 37 eggs (86.48 per cent) hatched and 24 (75.00 per cent) fledged in all nests. In Muskegon County, of 163 eggs, 119 (73.00 per cent) hatched and 102 (62.57 per cent) fledged. Of 27 Cowbird eggs laid in 25 different nests, only 8 (29.62 per cent) hatched and 7 (25.92 per cent) fledged. In 24 parasitized nests one egg was laid, in the other three eggs of the Cowbird. Concerning the 20 Cowbird eggs or hatched young that failed to leave the nest, one was deserted, eight eggs and one young taken by predators, five failed to hatch, two were built in the bottom of the Acadian Flycatcher nests by the female flycatcher, two disappeared (one of which was found beneath the nest on the ground--and one fell through the bottom of the nest. On only one parasitized nest in which a Cowbird hatched did young Acadian Flycatchers fledge. In this nest the Cowbird egg was laid later and correspondingly hatched later than the Acadians. In one nest, no Acadian eggs were observed at all. In five nests, 3, 2, 2, 3 and 1 Acadian eggs failed to hatch and in one nest, 3 young hatched but died before they were two days old. Apparently the Cowbird was responsible for the loss of these 14 Acadian eggs and young. Besides this loss, 3 Acadian eggs were deserted, 3 fell through the bottom of nests, 14 failed to hatch and 59 eggs were taken by predators, while the destructive factor of 13 was unknown. Con- cerning the young, 30 disappeared or died because of predators. During 1965, I observed a banded male Acadian Flycatcher in Emmett Township, Calhoun County, with two mates simultaneous- ly, each of which had a nest and eggs, and each of which fledged one young Cowbird (not included in the nest figures shown elsewhere in this paper). Although squirrels and chipmunks were common in all woods, they seemed unable to reach the spot where nests were located be- cause of the distance from the trunk and the weakness of the branch at that point. But in all three study woods, Cooper's Hawks nested every year. In one case I felt that one of these birds may have been responsible. In the Convis Township woods, I could see the Cooper's Hawk nest from the site of the Acadian nest regularly. In the Muskegon County woods, Barred Owls nested every year. Two nests were apparently lost to them. During 1964 a Barred Owl had a nest right in the heart of one Acadian territory. The first two Acadian nests met with failure, the next was built 55 feet up in the upper forest story and succeeded. ADULT WEIGHTS AND MEASUREMENTS Eleven breeding adult males have been captured, banded, weighed and measured. The average weight was 13.2 (11.9-13.9) grams. The average wing measurement, 75.7 (73-78) ram; tail, 62.5 min. Nineteen breeding females have also been banded, etc. The average weight, 12.7 (11.1-13.8) grams. The average wing measure- merit, 69.9 (67-75) ram; tail, 57.85 (51-63) min. SUMMARY The author has made studies of Empidonax flycatchers, including Empidonax virescens, in Michigan. This species occurs northward to central lower Michigan during the breeding season, reaching Oceana, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties. I studied the birds in three different woods, one in Muskegon, two in Calhoun counties. The Muskegon forests were mixed hemlock, beech, and maple; those in Convis Township, Calhoun County, maple, cherry, and oak; those in Emmett Township, Calhoun County, beech, maple and oak. In the Calhoun County woods, first Acadian Flycatchers appeared in spring between 6 May (1964) and 26 May (1929, 1948). On the three study areas 12 adult males were banded, 8 returned the year after banding; 5 the second year; 2 the third year; 1 the fourth year. Females, 19 were banded, 6 returned the second year; 5 the third; 4 the fourth. In all but one case returning pairs came back to their same mate and territory each succeeding year. Territory sizes in Muskegon County averaged 3.07 (1.8-4.2) acres; in Convis Township, 2.76 (2.1-3.8) acres, and in Emmett Township, 2.92 (2.1-4.2) acres. Trees used for nest sites in Muskegon County were hemlock (61.11 per cent), maple (3.7 per cent), and beech (31.48 per cent). The most common trees in 10 m quadrats there were Acer saccharum, Tsuga canadensis and Fagus grandifolia. The average number of all trees in 47 quadrats was 27.04 (15-42), ranging between 1/4 and 40 inches in girth. In the Convis Township woods, maple was the chief nest tree (68.18 per cent), and here the most common tree in 10 m. quadrats was Acer saccharum, followed by Prunus serotina and Quercus velutina. Here 16 (7-29) trees were found per quadrat, ranging between 1/4 and 24 inches in girth. In the Emmett Town-ship woods, beech (93.18 per cent) was the most common nest site, and the most common trees in 10 m quadrats were Acer saccharum, Fagus grandifolia, Quercus alba, Quercus velutina and Sassafras variifolium. An average of 38.52 (17-95) trees were found in each quadrat. The height of 138 nests averaged 405.5 cm. above ground ranging from 107 up to 1,676 cm, always built out on a long sweeping branch at least 24.4 to 558 (average, 326.6) cm from the tree trunk. One nest in Muskegon County consisted of 233 items, chiefly cobwebs and small dead hemlock twigs; one in Calhoun County consisted of cobwebs and 259 pieces of grass, sweet cicely, and dead leaves. The average measurements of 106 eggs were 18.64 X 13.99 mm and the average weight, 1.85 g. The average egg set in first Muskegon sets was 3.045, second sets, 2.929; in Convis Township, first sets, 3.0, second sets, 2.875; in Emmett Township, first sets, 2.923 and second sets, 2.800. The nesting season lasted from late May or early June until mid or late August. Most pairs attempted to raise two broods. Incubation required 13 (1), 14 (8), or 15 (2) days and was performed only by the female, who incubated at one nest for 84.1 per cent of the time during 196 minutes on two different days and for 91.13 per cent for short periods on three different days. Both parents feed the young, which remain in the nest 13 to 15 days. Of 121 Acadian nests, 78 had young fledge in them (64.46 per cent). Of 319 eggs, 216 (67.7 per cent) hatched and 183 (57.37 per cent) fledged. Cowbirds laid 27 eggs in 25 nests, three in one nest, one in each of the rest. These occurred in first nests only, and each Cowbird that hatched was usually fatal to the Acadian eggs (which failed to hatch) or to the young (they starved to death) for the Cowbird usually hatched prior to the Acadian eggs by as much as three days. Eleven breeding adult males averaged in weight 13.2 (11.9-13.9) g. Their average wing measurements, 75.7 (73-78) min. Nineteen breeding adult females averaged in weight 12.7 (11.1-13.8) g. Their average wing measurement was 69.9 (67-75) mm. REFERENCES CITED MrM'oRv, RrSSELL E. 1964. The Breeding Biology of the Acadian Flycatcher. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., Univ. Mich., No. 125. 50 pp. Woov, NORMAN A. 1951. The Birds of Michigan. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., Univ. Mich. No. 75, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 559 pp. 1703 Wolverine-Federal Tower, Battle Creek, Michigan Received February, 1965 (minor revision, December, 1965).