The Virgin Islands Screech-Owl Otus nudipes newtoni is a little-studied taxon whose current status is uncertain. It historically occurred on several small islands immediately east of Puerto Rico in the Caribbean. In an effort to assess its current status, I carried out surveys on St. John, St. Croix, and St. Thomas, the three largest of the United States Virgin Islands. Acoustic and visual surveys were carried out nightly for a 3-wk period during August 1995. Playback recordings of owl calls from the Puerto Rico subspecies did not elicit any responses during surveys, nor did I see any owls. I conclude that this taxon is extinct, because the three sampled islands contained the largest remaining patches of appropriate habitat for this species.
Department of Environmental, Population and Organismic Biology
University of Colorado
Campus Box B-334
Bould Colorado 80309 USA
and
Instituto de Educacitn Ambiental
Metropolitan University
R[o Piedras, Puerto Rico 00928 USA
ESTATUS DE OTUS NUDIPES NEWTONI
Sinopsis.--E1 Mficaro Pequefio de las Islas Virgenes Otus nudipes newtoni es una especie poco
estudiada cuyo estatus actual es incierto. Hist6ricamente ocurri6 en varias islas pequefias
imnediatamente al este de Puerto Rico en el Caribe. En un esfuerzo para evaluar su estatus
actual, realiz estudios en St. John, St. Croix y St. Thomas, las cuales son las m/rs grandes de
las Islas Virgenes Estadounidenses. Llev a cabo censos visuales y acfisticos nocturnos por
tres semanas durante agosto de 1995. No pude lograr respuestas usando una grabaci6n del
canto de la subespecie de Puerto Rico, ni observe individuos. Concluyo que esta subespecie
estgt extinta, porque las tres islas muestreadas contienen las parcelas ms grandes de hgtbitat
apropiado.
The Puerto Rican Screech-Owl Otus nudipes is endemic to the Puerto
Rico region (defined to include Mona, Monito, Puerto Rico, Culebra,
Vieques, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands), although related genera
and species occur on other Greater Antillean islands and Central America
(Bond 1980, Burton 1992). Two subspecies are recognized, O. n. nudipes
from Puerto Rico proper and O. n. newtoni from Vieques, Culebra, St.
John, Tortola, Virgin Gorda, St. Croix and Guana Island (American Or-
nithologists' Union 1983, Raffaele 1989, Sibley and Monroe 1990). O. n.
newtoni was named in 1860 from skins collected on St. Croix (Lawrence
1878). These birds were purportedly duller, grayer, and less rufescent
above than Puerto Rican specimens (Wetmore 1927). Howard and Moore
(1991) list a third subspecies, A. n. krugii, from the Lesser Antilles, but
the taxon is not generally recognized. Indeed, Lawrence (1878) synony-
mized Gymnoglaux (=Otus) krugii with O. nudipes over 100 years ago.
Although O. n. nudipes is still common on Puerto Rico, particularly in
the forested interior mountains and northwestern. karst region (Biaggi
1983, Wiley 1986, Raffaele 1989, Rivera-Milan 1995, Pardiek et al. 1996),
O. n. newtoni is rare in its historical range or may be extinct (Raffaele
1989). Based on the amount of habitat available on different islands with-
in the historical range and recent reports (see below), the probability of
encountering this species is greatest in the United States Virgin Islands.
I review the historical status of the Virgin Islands Screech-Owl and report
the results of a study to assess the current status of this taxon on the
islands of St. Thomas, St. Croix, and St. John.
HISTORICAL STATUS
Vieques.--The Virgin Islands Screech-Owl has been reported from Vie-
ques, where it is now thought to be extinct (Raffaele 1989). As far as I
have been able to ascertain, the Vieques record originated with a com-
ment by Wetmore (1927), who was informed that a resident had seen a
small owl several years earlier on the island. Based on this datum, it is
unlikely the owl has resided on Vieques in the immediate past; fossil data
are required to verify if it ever did. I searched Vieques for this species for
one week in June 1979 without success.
Culebra.--I was unable to find written remarks regarding the presence
of this species on Culebra. In over twenty research-related visits to this
island spanning 10 yr, I never saw nor heard this species. On two occasions
(1980 and 1986), I used playback recordings but never obtained a re-
sponse.
St. Croix.--When described, A. n. newtoni was considered rare on St.
Croix, although a breeding population existed. E. Newton (in Newton
and Newton 1859) obtained young birds on 30 May 1857 and 1 Sep. 1858.
Adults were taken in early June 1857 and 11 May 1858. No additional
records are available until over a century later, when Leck (1975) wrote
of unverified sightings in western St. Croix and Nellis (1979) saw two
birds. Norton (1986) posits that the latter record pertains to Asiofiarn-
meus.
St. John.--Riise (in Newton 1860) collected several birds from this is-
land. Norton (1981) reports a single owl sighting on St. John but suggests
that it may have been a vagrant O. n. nudipes or Asio fiammeus.
St. Thomas.--Eggs and skins were obtained from St. Thomas (Cassin
1860), although the taxon was considered rare (Knox 1852). No further
reports of owls from this island have appeared in the literature. Nellis
(1994, pers. comm.) informs me of recent unverified sightings by resi-
dents, however.
Guana Island.--S. Lazzell (1993, pers. comm.) reported owl pellets
from this island. No confirmed sightings have been recorded, however.
Tortola and Virgin Gorda.Although reported as part of the historical
distribution, I have been unable to verify records for these islands.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
I visited St. Thomas, St. Croix, and St. John during August 1995. Al-
though August does not coincide with the maximal calling period of O.
nudipes in Puerto Rico (Rivera-MilSn 1995; W. Arendt, pers. comm.), the
species calls throughout the year (pers. obs.; R. Perez, pers. comm.). I
T^BLE 1. Island visited, dates visited, total km sampled, and number of points surveyed
during surveys for the Virgin Islands Screech-Owl.
Point counts
Total km Total
Island Dates visited surveyed Playback Aural points
St. Croix 9-14 Aug. 1995 31.5 44 50 94
St. Thomas 15-20 Aug. 1995 26.4 39 40 79
St. John 21-25 Aug. 1995 45.0 12 20 32
assumed that owls in the Virgin Islands would also call year-round. Al-
though I confirmed that Screech-Owls were calling in both Puerto Rican
dry and moist forests by telephoning colleagues on Puerto Rico on most
survey nights, the possibility exists that my search coincided with a period
of low calling activity in the Virgin Islands. However, my past experience
with owls on Puerto Rico suggests that individuals of this species will al-
most always respond to taped calls if they are present.
On each island, I conducted surveys nightly between 1930 h and mid-
night (Table 1). This is the time of maximal calling activity for the pop-
ulations on Puerto Rico (pers. obs.; C. Ruiz, pers. comm.). Surveys con-
sisted of point counts where assistants and I stopped at pre-determined
intervals (usually every 0.3 km, although if it was unsafe to stop at a
particular site we drove ahead until a suitable area was found) and lis-
tened for owls. We drove between 17 and 33 km per hour to minimize
engine noise and increase our ability to detect calls between points
counts. At least one assistant aided every night, except on the night of
14 August when I conducted the survey alone. Assistants had prior ex-
perience in owl sampling methods.
Two approaches were used to detect this species. Aural surveys involved
listening for calling owls at, and between, point stations. During playback
surveys, I attempted to elicit responses by playing a taped territorial call
from O. n. nudipes recorded on Puerto Rico. Playback recordings have
been used effectively to survey nocturnal bird species such as owls (John-
son et al. 1981, Halterman et al. 1987, Bibby et al. 1993, Pardieck et al.
1996). The call was played continuously from a Sony stereo tape player
for 8-10 min at each point station. (De Geus and Bowles [1991] recom-
mended a sampling period of 10 min when surveying Eastern Screech-
Owls, Otus asio). Calls could be heard up to 0.4 km from the tape player.
My assistants and I were able to detect animal calls (e.g., dogs barking)
from as far away as 0.75 km at some sites.
Although I did not record cloud cover and wind speed at the different
sites, surveys were carried out during clear and calm conditions. However,
Pardiek et al. (1996) found no correlations between these variables and
calling activity of Otus nudipes on Puerto Rico.
I identified survey sites using three sources of information: areas iden-
tified by Virgin Islands Division of Wildlife personnel, by the staff of the
U.S. Park Service on St. John and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service personnel
on St. Croix; records of past sightings from the literature and personal
communication with observers; and on-site evaluation of habitat. I quali-
tatively assessed habitats as being suitable for the owl if they possessed the
following characteristics: large trees (native or introduced) with potential
to form cavities (e.g., mango, ceiba, large palms, etc.) and a relatively well
developed and moist understory. On Puerto Rico, sites with these char-
acteristics appear to harbor the most oMs (Biaggi 1983, Pardieck et al.
1996). O. nudipes is known to nest in cactus cavities in the Guanica Forest
of Puerto Rico (R. Prez, pers. comm.), but this behavior was never re-
ported in the Virgin Islands. Although owls inhabit urban areas in Puerto
Rico, and may do so in the Virgin Islands, I would expect their numbers
to be low at these sites. However, to ensure thoroughness, I completed
aural surveys within the main towns every other night. I stopped adjacent
to randomly chosen wood lots and houses surrounded by dense vegeta-
tion for ten minutes, but did not play owl calls. These data points are not
indicated in Table 1.
I interviewed local wildlife officials to assess whether they had seen or
heard owls in the immediate past.
RESULTS
Surveys.--No owls were detected in any locality on the three sampled
islands. I feel confident that all appropriate habitat was adequately sur-
veyed and that the probability of having missed a calling owl was small.
Interviews.--I interviewed and played the call of the owl to experienced
wildlife workers on each island. Not one individual had ever heard the
call while doing field work. All agreed they would have remembered this
unusual call if it had been heard.
After discussing D. Nellis's sightings of owls on St. Croix with him, we
concluded that the observation pertains to Asio fiammeus. The relatively
large size of the owls he saw, their behavior (flying up from a grassy field
to a stump and back to the ground) and the locality (a grassy field I
visited) are not consistent with O. nudipes.
DISCUSSION
Although it is always difficult to state with certainty that a taxon is
extinct, the available data strongly suggest the Virgin Islands Screech-Owl
is extinct on St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix. Because the latter three
islands contain the largest remaining patches of appropriate habitat with-
in the historical range, the taxon is most likely globally extinct as well.
O. nudipes probably has not re-colonized these islands from Puerto Rico
for one of two reasons. First, O. nudipes does not appear to be as good a
disperser as the more widespread A. fiammeus (Burton 1992). For ex-
ample, while carrying out wildlife surveys in the small islands between
Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, I have come across both breeding
pairs and single individuals of A. fiammeus, but never of O. nudipes. Al-
ternatively, O. nudipes may reach the Virgin Islands but, for unknown
reasons, cannot persist.
The Virgin Islands Screech-Owl most likely succumbed to the destruc-
tion of native forests in the latter part of the 19th century. Beginning in
earnest after 1750, over 90% of the forest cover on each island was cleared
for plantation crops, mostly sugar and cotton. This species requires old-
growth trees with cavities in which to nest. Today, between 6-7% of the
U.S. Virgin Islands are forested (Lugo et al. 1981).
The taxonomic status of O. n. newtoni is problematical, as the name
was assigned based on only slight plumage color differences (Lawrence
1878). W. Arendt (1997, pers. comm.) has banded several different col-
ored morphs of this species within a single forest in Puerto Rico, and I
have observed owls with newtoni coloration in southwestern Puerto Rico.
These observations suggest the subspecific designation is not valid. If a
reavaluation of this species results in synonimizing the two taxa, efforts
may be initiated to study the feasibility of re-introducing the owl to the
Virgin Islands from Puerto Rico.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank the following individuals without whose help this study could not
have been completed: Jorge Saliva of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service on Puerto
Rico, David Nellis and Judy Pierce of the Virgin Islands Division of Wildlife, Tom Kelley of
the National Park Service on St. John, and Mike Evans (USFWS) and his brilliant wife,
Maggie, on St. Croix. Luis (Kentucky) Rodriguez, Carlos Ruiz and Mari Plaza Munet toiled
long nights in all or some of the islands. Mary Pacheco of the Institute of Environmental
Education (Metropolitan University) provided invaluable logistic assistance. Raul P6rez-Ri-
vera, Wayne Arendt, C. Ray Chandler, and Jim Chase offered helpful suggestions that im-
proved the manuscript. This study was funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish
and Wildlife Service through grant number 1448-000-4-94-9152.
LITERATURE CITED
AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1983. Checklist of North American birds. 6th ed. Amer-
ican Ornithologists' Union. Washington, D.C.
BIAGGI, V. 1983. Las aves de Puerto Rico. Editorial Universitario. R/o Piedras, Puerto Rico.
BIBBY, C. J., N. D. BURGESS, AND D. A. HILL. 1993. Bird census techniques. Academic Press,
London, United Kingdom.
BOND, J. 1980. Birds of the West Indies. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachussetts.
BURTON,JOHN A., Ed. 1992. Owls of the world. Peter Lowe Books, London, United Kingdom.
DEGuS, D. W., AND J. B. BOWLES. 1991. Relative abundance of Eastern Screech-Owls in a
south-central Iowa township. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 98:91-92.
CASSIN, J. 1860. Catalogue of birds from the island of St. Thomas, West Indies, collected and
presented to the Academy of Natural Sciences by Mr. Robert Swift. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phil. 12:374-379.
HALTERMAN, M.D., S.S. LAYMON, AND M.J. WHITFIELD. 1987. Population assessment of the
Elf Owl in California. Dept. Fish and Game, Contract Report C-1931, FY 1985-86, Berke-
ley, California. 17 pp.
HOWARD, R., AND A. MOORE. 1991. A complete checklist of birds of the world. Academic
Press, London, United Kingdom.
JOHNSON, R. R., B. T. BROWN., L. T. HAIGHT, AND J. M. SIMPSON. 1981. Playback recordings
as a special avian censuing technique. Pp. 68-75, in C. J. Ralph and J. M. Scott, eds.
Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Studies in Avian Biology No. 6.
KNOX, J.P. 1852. A historical account of St. Thomas, W. I. C. Scribner. New York, New York.
LAWRENCE, G. N. 1878. On the members of the genus Gymnoglaux. Ibis 2:184-87.
LECK, C. F. 1975. Notes on unusual and rare birds of St. Croix. Condor 77:107.
LUGO, A. E., R. SCHMIDT, AND S. BROWN. 1981. Tropical forests in the Caribbeanß Ambio 10:
318-324.
NELLIS, D. W. 1979ß Record of Puerto Rican Screech Owl, Turkey Vultttre and Osprey from
St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islandsß Wilson Bull. 91:148-49.
NEWTON, A., AND E. NEWTON. 1859. Observations on the birds of St. Croix, West Indies, Part
I. Ibis 1:59-69.
ß 1860ß A letter upon the birds of St. Croix and neighboring islandsß Ibis 7:307-308.
NORTON, R. L. 1981. West Indies Report. Amer. Birds 35:338ß
ß 1986. West Indies Reportß Amer. Birds 40(3):528-29.
PARDIEK, K. L., J. M. MYERS, AND M. PAG/tN. 1996ß Surveys of Puerto Rican Screech-Owl
populations in large-tract and fragmented forest habitats. Wilson Bullß 106:776-782.
POWFAELE, H. A. 1989ß A guide to the birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Fondo
Educativo Interamericano, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
RIVERA-MILAN, F. E. 1995ß Distribution and abundance of raptors in Puerto Rico. Wilson Bull.
107:452-462.
SIBLEY, C. G., AND B. L. MONROE, JR. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the worldß
Yale Univß Press, New Haven, Connecticutß
WETMORE, A. 1927. The birds of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Scientific Survey of Porto
Rico and the Virgin Islandsß New York Acad. Sci., New York, New Yorkß
WIEY, J. W. 1986. Habitat change and its effects on Puerto Rican raptors. Birds of Prey Bullß
3:51-56.
Received 4 Feb. 1997; accepted 10Jul. 1997.